Negative (Amazon) Reviews Seem to Follow A Pattern - "Flight of the Forgotten"

   

 Amazon reviews for "Flight of the Forgotten" seem to follow a very simple pattern. Positive reviews are essentially from neutral sources and negative reviews almost exclusively derive from local inhabitants of the United Kingdom that don't like how their ancestors are portrayed. Pilfering of the crash site is a fact that UK residents seem incapable of accepting. The supposed rationale being predicated on religious devotion. That is indeed humorous as Nazis during the same era were known to be "born again" Lutherans. No doubt, their descendants are less-than proud of their actions also. Much of the "haunting" aspect of the story that locals choose to dismiss, was presented to us in person by locals during our on-site inspection of the crash site. What now has refused acceptance in Gairloch, Scotland was previously relayed to us directly by the very ancestors of those writing negative Amazon reviews. 

   The assertion that I am trying to sell the public on the facts of this story for personal gain is beyond ridiculous. The e-book is free and 100% of all proceeds from other formats are dedicated to promoting and sharing the men's story. The goal is to prevent the men's sacrifice from being forgotten. There is no personal financial gain by anyone involved in this effort, except the third-party services we have contracted to publish and promote the story. In short, local UK residents have nothing to be jealous of and no excuse for being so negative and petty.  

   Perhaps Amazon should require book reviewers to pass a test on their neutrality and legitimacy before offering them a platform for low-brow emotional response reviews on a subject they undoubtedly find both confusing and personally unacceptable. Before you question my honor and the honor of the staff of the FOTF Memorial Project, I would suggest that you scrutinize your own